Skip to content

Conversation

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI commented Nov 28, 2025

Test helpers had two inefficiencies: predictable random number generation using PIDs, and fixed 30-second polling intervals for cluster readiness checks.

Changes

  • randInt() in test/helpers/config.go: Replace PID-based pseudo-random with crypto/rand for proper uniqueness in resource names
  • WaitForClusterReady() in test/helpers/validation.go: Replace fixed 30s sleep with exponential backoff (10s → 60s cap, 2x factor)
  • test/go.mod: Add module description comment

Before/After

// Before: predictable, could cause test collisions
func randInt(max int) int {
    return int(os.Getpid()+int(os.Getppid())) % max
}

// After: cryptographically secure
func randInt(max int) int {
    n, err := rand.Int(rand.Reader, big.NewInt(int64(max)))
    if err != nil {
        return int(os.Getpid()) % max
    }
    return int(n.Int64())
}
// Before: always waits 30s between retries
time.Sleep(30 * time.Second)

// After: 10s → 20s → 40s → 60s (capped)
currentBackoff *= backoffFactor
if currentBackoff > maxBackoff {
    currentBackoff = maxBackoff
}
Original prompt

add a description to the repo then Identify and suggest improvements to slow or inefficient code


✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 28, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Add description to repository and suggest code improvements Improve test helper efficiency: crypto/rand and exponential backoff Nov 28, 2025
Copilot AI requested a review from tblakex01 November 28, 2025 05:43
@tblakex01 tblakex01 marked this pull request as ready for review November 28, 2025 05:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants